每条搜索结果均基于已公开的判决，绝不杜撰判例。
根据声明中的要求，第5、6、7、29、30和31段被删除。原告被允许在2022年11月18日之前提交一份修改后的声明。原告需承担被告的诉讼费用，根据协商或评估的金额支付。任何一方可以根据三天的通知提出申请。
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
2022年4月27日提交的发起申请被驳回。 宣布保罗H·戈尔奇有限公司和Petrie Dental Property Pty Ltd在2011年4月20日签署的租约为有效，该租约涉及位于25 Dayboro Road, Petrie的房产，准确描述为在Stanley县，Redcliffe区的第41地块，编号RP 30213, 标题14369058。 根据《2001年联邦公司法》第461(1)(k)条款，将解散Petrie Dental Property Pty Ltd。 任命Anne Meagher和David Michael Stimpson为Petrie Dental Property Pty Ltd的共同清算人。 任命Anne Meagher和David Michael Stimpson为Petrie Dental Property Unit Trust (Trust)的接收人，无需提供担保，管理所有现有和未来获得的财产、权利和承诺（Trust Property）。 宣布Petrie Dental Property Pty Ltd在其清算中对于作为Trustee对Trust负责任的相关职责所发生的费用、收费和开支享有权利免除（right of exoneration）。 作为Petrie Dental Property Pty Ltd的清算人，Anne Meagher和David Michael Stimpson有权依据以上第6条款中提到的权利免除，在不违反第11、12、13和14条款的前提下，将在Petrie Dental Property Pty Ltd清算中收到的Trust Property的收益用于按照《2001年联邦公司法》第5.6章第6节中所规定的优先顺序分配给Trust债权人。
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
2022年4月6日提交的申请，并在2022年8月8日修改的申请，被驳回。 法庭注意到以下事项： 除非提出上诉或法庭收到任何一方书面请求，要求撰写详细理由，否则法庭不会提供今天宣判的判决的书面版本。 注：判决书的形式应符合法庭记录的条目。 注：根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦法院法庭和家庭法院（第二分部）（一般联邦法）规则》，法庭可以更改或撤销判决或命令，以纠正次要的印刷或语法错误（第17.05(2)(g)条），或者根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦法院法庭和家庭法院（第二分部）（一般联邦法）规则》（第17.05条）记录变动的命令。
法院命令如下：（1）上诉被支持。（2）支持对Kiama地方环境计划2011年第4.2A条规定的住宅建设标准（最小地块面积），Chapman Planning Pty Ltd于2022年7月3日准备的第4.6条请求进行变更。 （3）对位于Gerroa的Crooked River Road 16号地点的建筑住宅和辅助住宅、游泳池（x2）、车道与相关景观设计的开发申请DA 10.2020.190.1，将在附件“A”中规定的条件下被批准。您的荣誉。
上诉被驳回，由上诉方承担费用。
Steven James Orr需要支付Hunter Quarries Pty Ltd在Orr v Hunter Quarries Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCCA 39中最终确定的问题提交法庭费用。
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
申请上诉被批准。 上诉被驳回。 申请人需支付上诉相关费用，包括被告的费用。 2020年12月15日在地方法院提交的申请书第2段被驳回。
这篇文本是一份法官对于问题提出的解答。问题围绕新南威尔士州刑事上诉法案的正确解释展开，主要包括法官是否可以撤回先前提交的问题，是否可以提交额外的问题，以及法院是否需要按照特定顺序来判断相关法案。法院对其中一些问题选择不予回答，并且拒绝回答法官Russell SC DCJ在Orr v Hunter Quarries Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWDC 307案件中提出的问题。
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
1. 驳回上诉 2. 要求上诉人支付被上诉方的费用
上诉人支付被上诉人的费用，金额固定为80,000美元。注意：订单的形式取决于法院记录中的输入。注意：根据“澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家庭法庭（家庭法）规则2021”第10.14(b)条，此法庭判决理由的副本可能会经过审核，以纠正轻微的排字或语法错误，或记录根据第10.13条的订单变更。特此说明，本法院根据家庭法1975（Cth）第121（9）（g）条批准以N Pty Ltd＆A Pty Ltd的化名发表此判决。
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
按照“滑铁卢储蓄的发展从2023年9月开始”的假设，损害赔偿不得以此为基础进行计算。
第 3 / 5 · 103 条