LegalLink
判例法官律所聊天定价
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI 驱动的法律咨询

产品

  • 判例
  • 法官
  • 律所
  • 聊天
  • 定价

公司

  • 隐私政策
  • 服务条款
  • Cookies 政策
  • service@legallink.info

资源

  • 意见反馈

按州查询律师注册名录

  • 新南威尔士州,NSW
  • 昆士兰州,QLD
  • 西澳大利亚州,WA
  • 南澳大利亚州,SA
  • 塔斯马尼亚州,TAS
  • 澳大利亚首都领地,ACT
  • 北领地,NT
  • 维多利亚州,VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. 保留所有权利。
首页案例库

真实 澳大利亚案例法

每条搜索结果均基于已公开的判决,绝不杜撰判例。

筛选
103 与 McCullough Robertson 相关的案例 · 按最新排序
律所:McCullough Robertson
  • CORPORATIONS LAWAPPEALOPPRESSIONOppressive conduct

澳大利亚“股东权益受损”案:法院重审揭示商业压迫真相

2021-07-28 STRICKLAND SYDNEY

申请对主审判决于2019年5月31日和2020年2月18日作出的命令进行上诉并获准。 上诉部分被准许。 2020年2月18日作出并于2020年3月12日修改的第4、5、6、7、8、10、13、14、15、16和17项命令被撤销。 终审救济问题将被重新审理。 费用保留。 申诉人应在这些命令生效后十四(14)天内提交并提供书面陈述,涉及费用问题,并要求被申诉人在再十四(14)天内提交回应意见。申诉人有权再在此后七(7)天内提交回复意见。 注意:订单的形式需符合法院记录的输入。注意:此份法院判决理由的副本可能会经过审查以纠正轻微的印刷或语法错误(2004年家庭法规定第17.02A(b)),或者根据2004年家庭法规定第17.02进行订单变更的记录。 根据澳大利亚1975年家庭法案第121(9)(g)条,该法院已经批准以假名N Pty Ltd&A Pty Ltd的名义公布本判决的出版物。

McCullough Robertson
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 232, 233
查看案例摘要
  • CRIMINAL LAWPROCEDUREINFORMATION, INDICTMENT OR PRESENTMENTAMENDMENT

    《法庭风波:上诉人投诉遭“无效”裁决,法官应否允许修正?》

    2021-07-25 REID

    以下是该文本的中文总结:1. 审查要求被允许。 2. 该案件被送交给地方法院根据法律进行审理,并由初审此案的法官之外的其他法官来决定。

    McCullough Robertson
    Criminal Code (Qld), s 564
    查看案例摘要
  • CONTRACTSconstructionmining tenementsroyalty payable as percentage of net sales realisation

    ### "澳大利亚矿业合约案:法庭裁定公司违反合同,赔偿超2350万澳元损失"

    2021-06-03 STEVENSON

    被告否认了其在资产售卖协议下的义务;原告有权终止资产销售协议,并且有权获得根据预计版税计算的未付版税和交易损失赔偿款项。

    McCullough RobertsonPiper Alderman
    查看案例摘要
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesorders

    土地分割成功获批,纳拉拉新住宅区迎来曙光!

    2021-05-11 CHILCOTT

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7
    查看案例摘要
  • HUMAN RIGHTSAntiDiscrimination Act 1977 (NSW)victimisation

    《残疾歧视案:权利的碰撞与司法的抉择》

    2021-05-09 A BRITTON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • APPEALdevelopment applicationdriveway and car parking spaceunacceptable impact on streetscape

    悉尼历史保护区遭遇停车之争:法院驳回‘车道’建设申请,称不符‘街景和遗产’!

    2021-04-29 BRADBURY AC

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4.15
    查看案例摘要
  • OCCUPATIONSlegal practitionersbarristersunsatisfactory professional conduct

    《法律界黑幕:男律师承认性骚扰女律师,接受教育与辅导惩戒》

    2021-04-15 HENNESSY

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • APPEALdevelopment applicationalterations and additions to caravan parkconsistency with zone objectives

    蓝眼沙滩公园改建案:长租与短租的命运博弈,法庭裁决推动社区发展

    2021-03-15 GRAY

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
    查看案例摘要
  • CRIMINAL LAWAPPEAL AND NEW TRIALVERDICT UNREASONABLE OR INSUPPORTABLE HAVING REGARD TO EVIDENCEAPPEAL DISMISSED

    冰管争议:澳大利亚高院驳回上诉,认定证据确凿

    2020-10-27 SOFRONOFF P

    The application has been rejected.

    McCullough RobertsonGibbs Wright Litigation Lawyers
    查看案例摘要
  • PROCEDURECIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTSDISCOVERY AND INTERROGATORIESDISCOVERY AND INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS

    法庭解禁:诽谤案中的证据使用权获得胜利!

    2020-10-22 KENT

    The application has been rejected.

    McCullough Robertson
    Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld), ss 10AA and s 32A.
    查看案例摘要
  • TAKING EVIDENCE FOR FOREIGN COURTApplication for orders for examination under Evidence on Commission Act 1995 (NSW)Where application made in respect of civil proceedings abroadStatutory scheme

    《海外取证:澳大利亚法院裁定对被告审讯的法律挑战》

    2020-10-15 WALTON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough RobertsonArnold Bloch LeiblerHerbert Smith Freehills (Melbourne)
    Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth)
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSderivative actionapplication for grant of leave by former director of company to bring proceedings in name of company under s 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

    《董事对抗董事:揭开公司争议背后的法律博弈》

    2020-10-01 STEVENSON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
    查看案例摘要
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREapplication for interlocutory restraining order pending hearing of appealjudicial review proceedingsdetermination of separate question

    《澳大利亚建筑行业重磅判决:支付安全法争议引发的司法审查揭示行业内幕》

    2020-09-20 BASTEN

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Australian Consumer Law (Cth), s 18
    查看案例摘要
  • CRIMINAL LAWPROCEDURES 222 APPEALCOSTS

    《重大法律纠纷!法庭裁定撤销原判,成功上诉者获赔13950澳元》

    2020-09-15 REID

    1. 所提诉求被允许。 2. 将裁判员驳回投诉的命令撤销。 3. 将此事交还给原执法官庭,由同一执法官裁定被告于2020年12月15日提出的第2款申请。 4. 如有需要,将此事交还给初审该案的执法官之外的另一位执法官根据法律进行进一步处理。 5. 要求被告支付上诉人的费用,金额为13,950美元。

    McCullough Robertson
    Justices Act 1886 (Qld) s 226, s 232A
    查看案例摘要
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWFreedom of informationconsultation with third partiesrisk of harm, serious harassment or serious intimidation

    《信息自由之争:第三方咨询引发的权益与隐私博弈》

    2020-09-14 LUDLOW

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997
    查看案例摘要
  • COSTSdetermination of a separately identifiable matter or a discrete aspect of the caseCOSTScosts payable forthwith

    胜诉即支付!澳大利亚判例明确成本支付新规则

    2020-09-08 STEVENSON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • EXPEDITIONSummons under s 32 of Evidence on Commission Act 1995Application for expeditionWhether factors warranting expedition

    美国证券委员会紧急申请:澳大利亚法院迅速响应,关键证据或将揭露贪腐阴谋

    2020-09-07 WRIGHT

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough RobertsonArnold Bloch LeiblerHerbert Smith Freehills (Melbourne)
    Evidence on Commission Act 1995 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • CRIMINAL PROCEDURESubmission of purported questions of law to Court of Criminal Appealwhen questions submitted after primary judge had delivered reasons finding prosecutor had failed to establish two elements of offence chargedwhether de facto appeal

    审判惊雷:法庭系统中的隐秘权利与公正辩论

    2020-08-27 BATHURST

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5(1)(f)
    查看案例摘要
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONdetermination under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999whether adjudicator acted beyond jurisdictionwhether adjudicator denied plaintiffs procedural fairness by deciding claim in favour of first defendant on basis not advanced by either party

    澳洲建筑合同争议:仲裁员裁决公正性之争,引发价值3200万澳元的诉讼

    2020-08-26 STEVENSON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • TAXES AND DUTIESSTAMP DUTIESASSESSMENT AND AMOUNT PAYABLE INCLUDING FINESGENERALLY

    《资金协议背后的法律之争:澳大利亚昆士兰州土地转让税案揭示合同对价的复杂性》

    2020-08-20 BRADLEY

    The application has been rejected.

    McCullough Robertson
    查看案例摘要
  • NOTICE OF MOTIONapplication to amend Respondent’s statement of facts and contentionsvacation of hearing datesprocedural fairness to Applicant

    疫情骤降与污染材料再现:澳大利亚法庭如何为程序公正调整听证日期?

    2020-08-03 CHILCOTT

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
    查看案例摘要
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONchange of usesuitability of the site for the developmentobjectives of the B1 Neighbourhood Centre zone

    《城区转型:墨尔罗斯公园纹身店开发申请获批,引发居民热议》

    2020-08-02 HORTON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
    查看案例摘要
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONProgress paymentsWhere right to present payment claim contingent on the provision of a draft payment claim on a certain dateWhether contingency void for unduly restricting the operation of the Building & Construction Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)

    《合同条款引发法律风波:进度款索赔权的法理探讨》

    2020-06-28 BALL

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONadjudication determination under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)whether determination voidwhether jurisdictional error

    《建筑行业诉讼风波:技术细节与合同条款之间的角力》 这个标题突出了案件的争议焦点,同时吸引读者的注意,反映出建筑行业中普遍存在的法律复杂性和商业利益冲突。

    2020-04-30 STEVENSON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough RobertsonMills Oakley
    Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • ‹12345›

    第 4 / 5 · 103 条