LegalLink
判例法官律所聊天定价
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI 驱动的法律咨询

产品

  • 判例
  • 法官
  • 律所
  • 聊天
  • 定价

公司

  • 隐私政策
  • 服务条款
  • Cookies 政策
  • service@legallink.info

资源

  • 意见反馈

按州查询律师注册名录

  • 新南威尔士州,NSW
  • 昆士兰州,QLD
  • 西澳大利亚州,WA
  • 南澳大利亚州,SA
  • 塔斯马尼亚州,TAS
  • 澳大利亚首都领地,ACT
  • 北领地,NT
  • 维多利亚州,VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. 保留所有权利。
首页案例库

真实 澳大利亚案例法

每条搜索结果均基于已公开的判决,绝不杜撰判例。

筛选
10 与 Roberts Gray Lawyers 相关的案例 · 按最新排序
律所:Roberts Gray Lawyers
  • CORPORATIONSDirectorsDuties under Corporations Act 2001(Cth), ss 180, 181, 182

    《董事背信交易案:澳大利亚上市公司Jatcorp与前高管的财产争夺战》

    2024-04-18 WILLIAMS

The text below discusses a judge's authority to issue orders during legal proceedings.

Roberts Gray LawyersAuyeung Hencent & Day Lawyers
Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 37A
查看案例摘要
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREapplication by plaintiffs to reopen after judgment reserved to tender judgment of foreign court and document produced on subpoenawhere plaintiffs failed to adduce evidence of relevant foreign law during hearing

    《反转再争辩:澳大利亚法院拒绝原告重新开案申请,责任纠纷持续发酵》

    2024-02-21 WILLIAMS

    原告申请重新开庭被驳回。

    Roberts Gray LawyersAuyeung Hencent & Day Lawyers
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 91, 157, 174, 175
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREApplication for leave under r 11.8AA of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) to proceed against foreign defendant served outside AustraliaApplication grantedNo question of principle

    澳大利亚法庭裁定:外籍被告裁判程序新挑战,诉讼修正引发争议!

    2023-10-29 WILLIAMS

    The text discusses the authority of the judge to issue orders in a legal proceeding. It emphasizes the importance of following the judge's orders and the consequences of failing to do so. The text also mentions the use of honorific titles, such as "your/his/her HONOR," when referring to the judge.

    Roberts Gray LawyersAuyeung Hencent & Day Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 56(3), 58, 64, 64(2)
    查看案例摘要
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDURESummary judgmentWhether defence has no real prospect of successDefendant’s defence clearly arguable

    《贷款违约余款之争:在线投资与CEG的法律博弈》

    2023-08-30 IRVING
    Roberts Gray LawyersRonayne Owens Lawyers
    查看案例摘要
  • CONTRACTFormationWhether subsequent agreement superseded earlier agreement to which lender was not a partyWhether implied agreement to terminate earlier agreement

    重磅判决:融资协议如何取代贷款契约?

    2022-07-11 EMERTON P
    Roberts Gray LawyersE C Legal
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSAppeal from associate judgeExamination by liquidatorsResumption of adjourned examination ordered

    内幕披露与检察权之争:澳大利亚执法机构对合法性与权力滥用的审理

    2022-04-11 ELLIOTT
    Roberts Gray LawyersThomson Geer
    查看案例摘要
  • 《IPO财富集团破产案:董事长的秘密审讯与资金流动谜团》

    2021-11-24 MATTHEWS ASJ
    Roberts Gray LawyersThomson Geer
    查看案例摘要
  • FAMILY LAWCOSTSwhere an order for costs was madewhere the quantum of costs the first named respondent was to pay the applicant was in dispute

    离婚财产争夺战:法庭判决丈夫支付超四万澳元合法费用

    2021-09-13 MACMILLAN MELBOURNE

    第一被申请人应支付申请人的费用,包括2020年2月21日提交的对于初始申请的回应中第1和第3段的费用,金额为41,517.72澳元。 申请人的费用申请将被驳回并从待审案件列表中移除。 注意:该判决书的形式将受到法庭记录的限制。 注意:此份判决书的副本可能会经过审查,以更正轻微的排版或语法错误(《联邦巡回法庭和澳大利亚家事法院(家庭法)规则2021》10.14(b)规定),或者根据第10.13条规定记录一项变更。 澳大利亚家事法1975年第121条规定,在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家事法法律程序中的人物、有关人物或证人身份的诉讼文件是违法的。 值得注意的是,根据《澳大利亚家事法1975年》第121(9)(g)条的规定,本法院批准以Ban & Chao为化名在本判决中发布。

    Roberts Gray LawyersKammoun Sukari Lawyers
    Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 19.18
    查看案例摘要
  • CONTRACTFormationOffer and acceptanceForm of loan deed signed by lender only

    澳大利亚华人贷款纠纷:150万背后的信任危机与法律博弈

    2021-09-02 RIORDAN
    Roberts Gray LawyersE C LegalGilchrist Connell
    查看案例摘要
  • EQUITYEquitable interestsPriority between prior unregistered mortgage and subsequent equitable chargeWhether the plaintiff had notice of the prior equitable interest

    《破产与法律:庭审争夺土地债权的精彩对决》

    2013-05-11 DALY ASJ
    Roberts Gray Lawyers
    查看案例摘要
  • 第 1 / 1 · 10 条